<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost of Being Unremarkable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/</link>
	<description>Straight Talk for Serious Children's Ministers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2009 03:00:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Evan Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-2550</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/#comment-2550</guid>
		<description>Henry, you make a great point.  That&#039;s kind of what I was trying to get at by saying that remarkable is not &quot;flash-in-the-pan&quot;.  Remarkable lasts longer than a flashy set, great graphics, or amazing music.  It&#039;s an endurable theory, not an object.  We&#039;ve been given a charge to keep, and that is to be our mission.  If we can adhere to that, we will be remarkable.

That is Starbucks issue right now.  They&#039;ve put away &quot;customer first, at any cost&quot; to &quot;cost first, at any loss of customer&quot;.  You are constantly marketing yourself.  Every detail is giving an impression of you.  Never assume you have a second chance, because you might not.  

Henry, I do totally agree with you.  Great addition!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Henry, you make a great point.  That&#8217;s kind of what I was trying to get at by saying that remarkable is not &#8220;flash-in-the-pan&#8221;.  Remarkable lasts longer than a flashy set, great graphics, or amazing music.  It&#8217;s an endurable theory, not an object.  We&#8217;ve been given a charge to keep, and that is to be our mission.  If we can adhere to that, we will be remarkable.</p>
<p>That is Starbucks issue right now.  They&#8217;ve put away &#8220;customer first, at any cost&#8221; to &#8220;cost first, at any loss of customer&#8221;.  You are constantly marketing yourself.  Every detail is giving an impression of you.  Never assume you have a second chance, because you might not.  </p>
<p>Henry, I do totally agree with you.  Great addition!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Henry Zonio</title>
		<link>http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-2546</link>
		<dc:creator>Henry Zonio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 23:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/#comment-2546</guid>
		<description>While I agree with what you are saying, the dangerous thing is that most children&#039;s ministry leaders will read this and translate &quot;being remarkable&quot; to having &quot;stuff&quot; that impresses rather than having substance, connection and community. Too many times, we in the children&#039;s ministry world spend so much time, effort and money on trying to have the biggest and most impressive environments, curriculum, toys, etc. but the substance is left behind. Don&#039;t get me wrong... the &quot;stuff&quot; is OK unless it overshadows the substance. Substance is what makes a CM remarkable. Community is what makes a CM remarkable. Meeting the spiritual needs of the families in your church is what makes a CM remarkable. The rest is just taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I agree with what you are saying, the dangerous thing is that most children&#8217;s ministry leaders will read this and translate &#8220;being remarkable&#8221; to having &#8220;stuff&#8221; that impresses rather than having substance, connection and community. Too many times, we in the children&#8217;s ministry world spend so much time, effort and money on trying to have the biggest and most impressive environments, curriculum, toys, etc. but the substance is left behind. Don&#8217;t get me wrong&#8230; the &#8220;stuff&#8221; is OK unless it overshadows the substance. Substance is what makes a CM remarkable. Community is what makes a CM remarkable. Meeting the spiritual needs of the families in your church is what makes a CM remarkable. The rest is just taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd McKeever</title>
		<link>http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/comment-page-1/#comment-2544</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd McKeever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thewayweseeitblog.com/2007/12/30/the-cost-of-being-unremarkable/#comment-2544</guid>
		<description>Evan I truly enjoyed this post and couldn&#039;t agree more. I too love my Starbucks as well, actually my wife is a shift manager there as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Evan I truly enjoyed this post and couldn&#8217;t agree more. I too love my Starbucks as well, actually my wife is a shift manager there as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.297 seconds -->
